Zool paper's taking forever to write. It's not that the material is difficult or hard to write about, it's just finding the information and condensing it into what want it to be. Working on it. Projected completion time should be tomorrow. But that won't include refining it and whatnot.
It seems like at least once every week where there's a moment where I feel abject failure. Like nothing I'm doing is right. Nothing is correct. I can't satisfy anyone. I can't meet anyone's standards. I'm not productive. I haven't exercised at all. Grammar fail. It's... doubtlessly unhealthy, but... well, this lack of confidence is not entirely new.
More data crunching. Another 2.5 hours.
Realized that I spent a good 5 -6 hours on Tuesday for SU stuff. 2.5ish hours deliberating on scholarships (a reminder of how little I'm involved with on campus) and then the rest of it was a very very uncomfortable SLC.
CRO's post-election report degenerated into some sort of hate circle as the CRO, having to stand at the center of the circle to present, was bombarded by questions from all sides of the circle. That must've been ridiculously rough and to be honest, rather unfair. Personally, she didn't do an amazing job, but she did do a satisfactory one where she did do everything within her job description and powers. It's a shame that the issue with the joke candidates came up, but it's being played out to be something much larger than it has to be. By-law ambiguity doesn't help, nor do vague answers and aggression-fueled responses.
You'd have to wonder though, there really isn't much the CRO can do other than a small slap on the wrist. There isn't anything in the by-law that represents a strong enough punishment that will actually deter people from violating the rules. The rampant campaigning in MacHall and around the voting booths spoke to that. The CRO can only tell them to go away, but the damage is already done, no?
The excusal motion later in the meeting also didn't do anything to lighten the mood that evening. Basically, for each semester, you'll get in trouble if you miss either 4 meetings overall or 3 meetings consecutively. These non-excused absences are there for random instances (i.e. non-SU or academic related events) wherein you can't make the meeting such as being slightly sick. If of course, you were so sick that it warranted going to the hospital or being able to obtain a doctor's note, that's a different story and would be acceptable for excusal as well.
However, this is poorly thought-out by the former Arts Rep. Having missed two unexcused meetings due to 'sickness', then having missed a third to attend an event, you're completely out of space for anything that may suddenly happen. Was the event important enough to lock yourself into such a hole? Probably not. Risking being impeached so late into the term is not the way to go out. The wrong bang if you will.
A shame that despite having missed probably 6 or 7 meetings due to illness that you didn't learn to at least get a doctor's note of sorts, or probably to the point where you're sort of on the fence for acceptable or non-acceptable, but too many enemies were made.
But... her email doesn't really put things in the correct light: "It is my regret to inform you that I must end my term early as a Faculty of Arts representative due to missing a meeting for having the flu last week (and having missed additional meetings due to illness)." Sigh. Some people.